Contact me for thetravelnotes.com suggestions or questions! I reply to everybody.

Technological slavery

Introduction

Technology is inseparable from civilization. It has changed the world endlessly. Thanks to it, we will, for example, ship data to the other finish of the world in seconds; discuss to individuals from other continents; journey to any place on this planet in sooner or later; store 1000's of photos on a drive the dimensions of your thumb; create virtual realities, as well as do a bunch of other things that nobody would have imagined just 100 years in the past.

But expertise has its dangerous aspect too. In the current world, it is controlled by organizations who don't have our greatest pursuits in mind. They won't hesitate to use know-how's nice power in opposition to us. Spying on - and analyzing - our communication; controlling the data we receive; emotional manipulation; modification of behavior - those are only a few things technology is being used for today. All that with more coverage, accuracy, effectiveness and with much less human effort. If this "progress" is just not stopped, we will end up in a prison that we wouldn't find in our worst nightmares.

I'll try to describe the best way the most important technologies of right this moment contribute to the creation of a global system of management. I may even point out a couple of technologies of the long run, and try to attach all the data collectively and predict the destiny of this world. Let's start with one of many inventions that have an effect on people essentially the most - The Internet.

The Internet

Every connection, for example sending a message, or coming into a website, goes by your Internet Service Provider, before it reaches the target. In principle this implies ISPs can freely spy on and modify every little thing you do on the web; for example - decelerate or block the downloading of torrents; inject commercials to your visited websites http://zmhenkel.blogspot.com/2013/03/isp-advertisement-injection-cma.html (archive) (MozArchive), or even create a large censorship system, just like the so-known as "Great Wall" of China.

The most common usage of the Internet is shopping websites, for which we use a web browser resembling Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer or Google Chrome. These three "giants" just about exist to gather information on their customers. Google not less than admits to it - on the other hand, Mozilla pretends to care about your freedom and privateness, but actually spies on you and controls you. It's been a few years since Mozilla determined they are going to decide what add-ons you'll be able to and cannot install - apparently to "protect the users", however nothing stops them from, for instance, disabling AdBlock. Mozilla has worked with advertisers for a long time - they've even proven them in your New Tab panel: https://blog.mozilla.org/advancingcontent/2015/05/21/providing-a-valuable-platform-for-advertisers-content-publishers-and-customers/ (archive) (MozArchive). The parable of Firefox "respecting the person" has died and won't resurrect. Just learn a sure reply from their webpage: Our products don't interrupt the looking expertise; they catch users when they're most receptive to seeing new data. So, for them, you might be merely prey to be caught for the aim of having ads be shoved into your brain. Despite that, they still spew slogans about "respect and freedom". I might spend the whole article on pointing out all of the ways in style internet browsers exploit you. Opera, for example, actually spies in your entire internet history without your data. The three giants talked about earlier also spy on you, however in another methods.

Almost each large website works carefully with the police / authorities and can happily share information about you with them - for example, the IP address of the pc you made a forum post from. Exceptions, corresponding to Lavabit (fascinating story by the best way - you'll be able to learn it on the internet) or The Pirate Bay, have their servers raided.

Lately, it became fashionable to store your knowledge "within the cloud", for instance Dropbox or Google Drive. This is basically helpful to the elites - they can now see and analyze your files, which can give them details about your interests or plans (which might be used in opposition to you). One guy from 4chan was storing bomb making directions on Dropbox, only to seek out that, at some point, they have been deleted. The Internet is filled with instances like that, and they don't seem to be all about bombs. Thus, we can see that your data is not protected on these cloud "services" - it ceases being yours. Probably, in several years, wanting to maintain your information on your own drive will likely be thought of "abnormal" - and cloud storage might be the usual - like it's at the moment with money vs bank accounts, for example. This may open the door to complete management of your saved data, mechanically blocking materials about - for example - the aforementioned bombs. Another, maybe extra plausible option, would be punishing the people who add such files - like movie producers did with folks downloading sure torrents.

Google

How do most individuals find data on the internet? Using Google, in fact. But Google is something greater than only a search engine - it is a company whose purpose is gathering as much knowledge as attainable and creating a profile about you. Their spy scripts (for example, google analytics) exist pretty much on every site - you might even not know what Google is, however nonetheless be spied on. That knowledge is then used to, for instance, present you focused commercials, but additionally completely different search results. So a Christian looking for "abortion" will see one thing else than an atheist.

Google went additional and invented a new algorithm for displaying search results. The sites who are, in accordance with them, based mostly on "info" shall be larger up. Alternatively, those that contain untrue information (once more, according to them) will probably be additional down. One of many ways Google charges the truth worth of web sites is comparing them with the articles on Wikipedia. And since we know the way Wikipedia treats conspiracy theories, we are able to assume they will pushed away by official versions of events. Soon, after we seek for one thing like "genetically modified organisms" we'll solely get "ready" data. Google's invention might turn into certainly one of the simplest instruments of censorship and opinion management.

Google also controls different frequent providers. One in every of the most popular is YouTube, which they've been "reforming" since they purchased it. I was shocked when a few years in the past I could not log in to my YouTube account without making a Gmail account. I didn't need their e-mail (which spies on you) so I said goodbye to YouTube. I did not use it much, however nonetheless.

Another YouTube reform is known as Content ID. It is supposed to guard copyright. The creator of a film or song can share their creation with Google, which is able to then evaluate it with each different file on YouTube. If it considers a kind of files shut enough to the submission, it will either delete that file, take away sound from it, or add ads.

- Nintendo was ready to put advertisements on some motion pictures showcasing their games: http://www.destructoid.com/nintendo-is-claiming-possession-of-let-s-play-movies-253793.phtml (archive) (MozArchive)- An individual uploaded some birds singing. Content ID assumed it was some copyright protected tune, and added ads to it, which earned the creator of the nonexistent tune money. https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120227/00152917884/man-gets-bogus-youtube-copyright-claim-birds-singing-background.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- Some company even put commercials on someone else's song, and earned cash from it: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150317/10513630347/umg-licenses-indie-artists-observe-then-makes use of-content material-id-to-declare-possession-it.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)

Before Content ID was invented, someone who thought that a movie violates copyright, had to ship YouTube a kind, which could possibly be accepted or not. As of late although, they've a much easier means called Content ID, which allows them to earn money if it finds some similarities. You'll be able to theoretically attraction a Content ID choice, but it's pointless since the enchantment will likely be decided by...the identical firm that uploaded the file. Many pissed off people are complaining in web comments, saying that Content ID is terrible, that it made a mistake with their film, that they're stealing their cash, that they've misplaced their recordsdata or their account. There've been debates about copyright and AI generally. Some individuals have said that film or music creators ought to be pleased to have their content shared on YouTube. But these discussions can exist only as a result of Content ID occurred. Without it, individuals could freely share their movies without them being probably modified / deleted by automated analysis.

The same program could possibly be used to delete movies about undesirable matters. Even now YouTube is deleting "racist", "nationalist", "insulting" films - even if usually that's simply an excuse; however they need to do it by hand. If they put together Content ID with the location sorting algorithm, they could create a system that deletes sure content material mechanically. A more superior form of that algorithm could even delete sure components of motion pictures which have undesirable matters (for instance, deleting a couple of second lengthy part with a racist slur). It might work much like the profanity filters on boards. However it wouldn't be restricted solely to that - Google has shown, that they're very considering controlling your beliefs, once they've created the positioning sorting algorithm I spoke about earlier. A tool that might detect the place in your film an undesirable matter is mentioned, and replace it with their modified version, could be very welcome in their arsenal.

You can write a complete guide about Google; I do not need to do it - however I need to briefly mention some other issues they've done. Recaptcha is the most popular technique to defend forums from spambots. In case you wanted to put in writing something on a discussion board with recaptcha, you needed to kind a sure phrase. You did not always get a phrase, though - you can get something like a street address, which would then get added to Google StreetView, which permits spying on people. For years, anyone who wrote on 4chan, was filling their database with street addresses, while not essentially figuring out about that. What really is StreetView? Google cars travel the world taking photos of all the things and everybody. Then they put these photographs of their database, which could be searched by anyone. Google has entry to photos of the entire Earth, just about - and even to the history of locations individuals seek for utilizing their maps. What might that info be used for? You possibly can learn on Wikipedia that lots of nations had a problem with StreetView. They thought it intrudes on the citizen's privateness. But after "consultations" they've all agreed to allow it. Isn't this evidence that we're dealing with a worldwide plan to spy on individuals?

They've modified ReCaptcha since I wrote the above. Now, you get a set of footage and you've got to decide on the ones containing a sure item, for instance hamburgers. This is used to train Google's synthetic intelligence, which will even most likely be used in opposition to us sooner or later. I'll end this section with a quote from Google We do not need you to kind in any respect. We know where you are. We know the place you've got been. We can more or less know what you are interested by.

Social networks

Certainly one of the most well-liked web websites lately are social networks, comparable to Facebook or Twitter. People flock to them like flies, filling their databases with data corresponding to name, surname, phone quantity, place of work, interests, and friend lists. They do not have a problem with sharing their political opinions. Facebook makes it very easy, for the reason that Like! button seems on most popular websites, and clicking it sends information to Facebook about the article you appreciated. How may they use that information? For instance, for exhibiting focused commercials. A number of years in the past, Facebook promised that it would never do that - however then modified their thoughts and it's now a actuality. Some of these ads can be insulting - for instance, a person affected by cancer, after searching for information about it on the internet, was shown advertisements about...burial providers! http://www.naturalnews.com/049386_Facebook_privateness_surveillance.html (archive) (MozArchive)

Comments written on these social networks are much more harmful. They are connected to your real name, and whoever finds your account can read them. What may very well be the consequences of that? You may lose your job or be arrested. Some examples:

- An individual was arrested for posting lyrics of a heavy steel track on Twitter. The government thought he was literally threatening to kill individuals and he was arrested. This incident was described in detail right here: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140906/13490628443/heavy-steel-lyrics-posted-to-fb-outcome-arrest-terrorist-threats.shtml (archive) (MozArchive)- A waitress misplaced their job forty eight hours after complaining on Facebook that she's earning too little in tips. http://www.inc.com/news/articles/2010/05/waitress-fired-for-fb-submit.html (archive) (MozArchive)

We could be focusing on singular conditions - was someone punished appropriately or not? You could even blame the victim. But the logical thing to do is to have a look at the whole situation from afar. If these feedback have been made in person, and never on the internet, no one may have gotten in bother. The opportunity of punishing someone is the consequence of the technology that attaches the things you publish to your title. After years of utilizing social networks, you might discover one thing on anyone, even if he didn't assume that the message he's writing would have given him issues later.

300 employers have been asked whether they've checked the profiles of their would-be recruits, and 91% agreed. 69% dismissed an worker due to something he had in his profile. Among the offending issues were: unfavourable opinions about previous employers, photographs of using medication or drinking alcohol, or "inappropriate" photos.

There are also extra direct ways in which the social networks can have an effect on you. In 2014 Facebook did a psychological experiment that was supposed to show which you could management human minds without realizing them personally, and without their data. 689003 people (who weren't conscious of being lab rats) had been divided into two teams - one in every of them was proven only content material producing optimistic emotions, the opposite - solely damaging. The extra positive content somebody saw, the extra positively he himself responded. The differences had been small, however perhaps they may very well be elevated with extra drastic measures. For instance, displaying somebody articles about murders or kidnappings. You can also target the content material someone was going to be shown individually - based mostly upon the issues he's written in his profile, or his browsing historical past (which Facebook collects by way of the Like! buttons). If someone reads plenty of anti-authorities web sites, they would be shown articles about the government doing one thing dangerous. Or an anti-GMO person can be shown information about GMOs being legalized someplace. It's plausible that this experiment opened the door to simply this sort of factor. You may read the whole experiment right here: http://www.pnas.org/content material/111/24/8788.full (archive) (MozArchive)

Facebook also uses an algorithm for detecting faces on photos and mechanically adding a reputation to them. http://www.dailydot.com/expertise/facebook-deepface-science/ (archive) (MozArchive). If your identify is on a minimum of one photograph, every different photograph along with your face could possibly be detected as you.

Communication and encryption

More and more human communication is done electronically. This has the same downside as bank accounts - you pay for a basic human want. But that's not an important. A human speaking eye to eye is spontaneous. He knows solely the particular person he is speaking to can hear him. Then he brings that angle in direction of speaking within the phone, which follows different rules - all knowledge about when, the place, and to whom you made the call is stored in the provider's database. In most international locations the police has entry to the info if they've the court docket order. But in Great Britain - the chief of electronic spying - three of four most used providers ship all their knowledge to police in real time: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/10/computerized-police-access-clients-mobile-phone-records-like-cash-machine-ripa-three-ee-vodafone/ (archive) (MozArchive). The implications are huge - the identical group (the police) who can effective or punish you, now has entry to all your telephone calls. People have been locked up for SMS messages earlier than, however normally they needed to physically search their phones. This requirement disappears with the automatic system of sending messages to police.

The same is true of web communication. Most people use common tools like Gmail or Skype. In certainly one of his leaked paperwork, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA (National Security of America) has a program referred to as PRISM, with which these companies cooperate. Since 2011, Skype gives access to your conversations to the NSA, including video recording:

In fact, we could use less standard software program with an encryption capability, but would that protect us from spying?

David Cameron, the prime minister of Great Britain, got here up with an idea to ban encryption, arguing that There ought to be no means of communication, which we cannot read. Many individuals laughed, saying that the government would have to delete encryption software program from individuals's exhausting drives (and would that really be a problem for them? Malware exists, you recognize). Others thought that they can not implement it, as a result of it would make banking and such insecure. But this appears more like a determined solution to dismiss the chance that, in the close to future, all our conversations finished electronically might be spied on by the government.

In one other leak of NSA's documents, it was shown that they want to reduce the effectiveness of widespread encryption:

You need not work with a software program's creator to spy on our conversations, although. Even in open source software (that anyone with enough knowledge and dedication can inspect), there still happen bugs that may weaken the encryption. For instance, OpenSSL, the most popular library encrypting our communications with websites, for 1.5 years had a bug permitting to download a small quantity of data from the reminiscence of the server that it is used on, and that knowledge could include passwords and encryption keys. NSA, after all, took advantage of that: https://www.bloomberg.com/information/articles/2014-04-11/nsa-stated-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-shoppers (archive) (MozArchive) Another instance: Cryptocat screwed up the implementation of an encryption algorithm, which allowed anyone with enough capability to decrypt communication made with it. And NSA has these capabilities - additionally they save all encrypted communications, to allow them to decrypt it later.

And they'll most likely succeed - there is a big probability that quantum computer systems will make all current ciphers irrelevant - https://hackaday.com/2015/09/29/quantum-computing-kills-encryption/ (archive) (MozArchive) - so non-public conversations might be a factor of the past. Add to that voice recognition software program, and we're discovering ourselves in a world where all our conversations are looked for certain phrases (by a program similar to Content ID I've talked about earlier).

Electronic banking

Cash payments are more and more typically being changed by digital ones. People just like the consolation of being able to order anything they want and pay for it with a few clicks. Having a bank account is one thing regular nowadays, even required. But behind the curtain conceal gigantic implications for human privacy and freedom.

Let's start from the fundamentals - what's digital cash? It is a number in a database on a server belonging to the bank you're utilizing. Your capacity to buy anything relies on how large that number is - and since humans have to, for example, eat - your life depends on it. How much digital cash you've gotten relies on a lot of belongings you can't have an effect on - just utilizing a checking account prices cash, so participating on this system means you routinely lose it.

A bank can eat much more of your money - even with out bearing in mind hacking assaults like this: https://thehackernews.com/2016/05/swift-banking-hack.html (archive) (MozArchive), where the hackers stole 12 million dollars. One man from Cyprus bought 720 000 Euros stolen by the european commission to repay Cyprus' debt. He had to fireplace all his Cypriot employees and transfer to a different country. First, the sum was displayed as "blocked", then they deleted it altogether from his account. And, as he himself says, Thousands of different corporations round Cyprus have the same scenario. This exhibits how a lot you possibly can depend on a quantity in a database - all it takes is one thought in someone's thoughts, and it is gone. Read extra about this topic here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?subject=160292 (archive) (MozArchive)

Another problem with electronic funds is the truth that they're anti-privacy. All of your transactions are saved within the financial institution's database. And the people controlling the financial institution can use it towards you - blocking unwanted transactions, comparable to buying bitcoins http://www.coindesk.com/dutch-bank-rabobank-blocks-bitcoin/ (archive) (MozArchive) or donations to WikiLeaks: http://www.bankrate.com/finance/credit score-playing cards/naughty-issues-credit-card-wont-buy-6.aspx (archive) (MozArchive). It's easy to imagine a world the place all of your transactions are analyzed and mechanically blocked based on a list of banned gadgets.

Paper money does not have that problem. It will not disappear from your pocket. There isn't any central point that stores details about your transactions. You can't "flip somebody off" if he pays with paper money - if someone doesn't need to promote you one thing, you go someplace else. Paper cash is a software of the free individual - that's why the elites are targeting it.

But you'll be able to still use paper cash, proper? Maybe not for long - they've been attempting to get people used to digital funds for a very long time. Advertising financial institution accounts is commonplace. More and more employers require having a bank account. The boundaries on the amount you may spend directly with paper money are going down worldwide:

Will they go right down to zero? In some locations that's already the case; for instance, buses in London cannot be paid for in cash since 3 years ago. The quantity of cashless locations will enhance, and people can be tied up within the electronic net of slavery.

2017 update: since writing the above, the scenario has obtained much worse. In Sweden, payments are nearly fully digital: https://www.theguardian.com/enterprise/2016/jun/04/sweden-cashless-society-playing cards-cellphone-apps-leading-europe (archive) (MozArchive) - Swedish buses have not taken cash for years, it's unimaginable to buy a ticket on the Stockholm metro with money, retailers are legally entitled to refuse coins and notes, and road distributors - and even churches - increasingly want card or phone funds.

In November 8 of 2016, the prime minister of India has eradicated the two largest notes, which increased the amount of debit card payments by 108%. In the radio he said Less-money first, cashless society next. There are many other examples in several nations, reminiscent of Denmark, the USA, and many others. There's little question we're coping with a worldwide plan to destroy cash.

CCTV cameras

The strongest weapon of the technological management system are undoubtedly the CCTV cameras. While you may largely avoid all the other things (a minimum of for now), the cameras are doing their job just by present. They have been slowly being put into numerous places - from retailers and faculties to the streets, buses and flats; you may assume that wherever you move, your life is being saved, watched and analyzed by strangers. I've identified a place where some drunks liked to fulfill up and they put a camera in there, which the drunks destroyed. But the next day they changed it once more, so it is clearly essential to them.

The existence of the spying system fully modifications the relations between people and the elites. You cannot really feel snug realizing that your every move is being spied on (by people who can even punish you in the event you do something they deem "wrong"). Most individuals do not seem to care though - they purchase in retailers loaded with cameras and send their youngsters to varsities that have cameras. Some are even glad that they are being watched, repeating dumb slogans about "security", or different excuses that don't have anything to do with actuality. But that is just the beginning - the effectiveness of the spying system will increase a lot that you won't be capable of stay the best way you always have. So what's the subsequent section of this system?

Advanced cameras can do way more than just recording video and relying on the human's interpretation. They can spy on a human as he goes from one digicam's vary to a different's, detect faces, mark individuals in line with gender or different standards:

They can also detect your habits and mark it as doubtlessly "suspicious". This is already being utilized in locations like India https://www.good.com/protecting/press-releases/Nanded-India-Deploys-Nice-Safe-City-Solution-to-Protect-Citizens-Visitors-and-Historical-Sites-129 (archive) (MozArchive), Glasgow https://www.good.com/protecting/press-releases/Nice-Safe-City-Solutions-Deployed-in-Glasgow-to-Bolster-Security-Safety-and-Operations-Management-137 (archive) (MozArchive), and even within the Polish city Katowice http://katowice.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/katowicki-inteligentny-system-monitoringu-i-analizy-czyli,2656606,artgal,t,id,tm.html (archive) (MozArchive)

This system makes absolute slaves out of people. There is a central level by which the police can analyze all the data. One of many "suspicious behaviors" that had been being marketed by the CCTV firms was taking out a pistol out of your pocket. But something in any respect might be considered "suspicious". Let's look at among the widespread issues that I've seen being banned: selling stuff on the streets, feeding birds, carrying a mask, walking the dog (!), driving without seat belts, and so forth. Sometimes people get fined for these items, however they should be came upon first. The clever monitoring system removes this requirement, letting the psychopathic elites positive anyone for something they think about.

Imagine you are walking by means of an alley that is loaded with these cameras while consuming a sandwich. Then you throw away the bag wherein the sandwich was. A digicam sees that and assigns you a effective of 50 dollars for littering. Your face has been detected and the path you are taking is now being watched and sent to the police in real time. A few minutes later the police comes; you're trying to cover but it's unimaginable, since there are cameras in all places, and they know your place. In the long run, you pay up, the identical as anyone who has ever littered. This may look humorous now, however the expertise exists to make this situation a reality, it's just a matter of implementing it. The ads for these cameras make it clear - being in the gang won't protect you. Neither will hiding your face, changing clothes, transferring somewhere, etc. People will for sure attempt to discover a strategy to idiot this system, and they could even succeed at the beginning - but the algorithms will get higher, and can ultimately make it impossible to idiot them.

Inventions of the future

There are different technologies, which have been lately invented, that sooner or later will fuel the management system. Pretty much every new invention has the potential to do this (and even is invented for this reason), but I will strive to describe crucial ones.

Microchips

There's a massive marketing campaign all over the world to put chips in individuals's pets, allegedly to "be capable of finding them", but really the point is to get folks used to the thought of chipping. After which they are going to chip the people. In some bars or workplaces they are already getting used to, for example, open doors; after sufficient propaganda they are going to be injected in every youngster that's born. They'll change ID playing cards, credit cards, and different present documents. They are going to be required in increasingly more locations, and you will not be capable of satisfy primary needs (corresponding to buying) without them. Why do the elites wish to chip the individuals so dangerous? Because it is going to allow them to create a huge database containing the time and place of every particular person. This has already been tried in some American colleges, for instance: http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/children-tagged-rfid-chips-creepy-new-technology-colleges-use-observe-every thing-children-do (archive) (MozArchive). The kids wear ID cards on their necks, and those playing cards have the chips in them. Their position is being sent to the college computers in real time, as well as detecting events such as getting into or leaving faculty, shopping for lunch, or getting into the library. It's only a matter of time till all of us have them under our skins.

Holograms

Advertisements have been with us for a long time, even before technology. You can avoid them by installing AdBlock or switching to another Tv channel. But you won't be in a position to hide from an commercial displayed, for example, on grass or the sky. I believed that is far into the long run earlier than I wrote this article, however actually, this has already been tried: https://thefutureofthings.com/5069-nike-launched-a-holographic-3d-advertising-marketing campaign/ (archive) (MozArchive) This may be used not solely to advertise merchandise, but persuade people of the fact of a sure version of events.

Self-driving cars

Already being tested in, for instance, California https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-01/tesla-is-testing-self-driving-vehicles-on-california-roads (archive) (MozArchive). And when they'll lastly be put into roads, we'll keep hearing about how secure they're (this already happens, but might be way more common). When people finally get satisfied of the security of those cars, regular cars shall be banned since they're allegedly much less secure than the computer-managed ones. So we will be able to drive solely in keeping with the path the computer chooses, which is able to in fact even be stored in the global database. Cars with no steering wheel (already exist) may even forestall fleeing from the police.

Culmination of the technological management system

The final aim of the technological control system is placing together all these tools to allow full control of humanity. To make use of the Internet, you will have to offer your actual identify (or perhaps flash a microchip?) - so Everything we do there can be linked to our actual person. All encrypted connections and conversations might be decrypted on the fly and analyzed. Freely downloading torrents and even making jokes like "die in a fireplace" will likely be a factor of the previous. All the data you receive will likely be managed - much like what Facebook and Google already do, but globally.

Our physical place will be tracked by cameras and microchip scanners which will probably be in places reminiscent of retailers, airports, flats, and many others. So our movements will be analyzed in actual time - however not by folks, like it is now, however by AI (or even robots, farther sooner or later). You will not be capable of flee from this system - they are going to even spy on the homeless (there were already programs to find and catalogue the homeless' place, allegedly to help them, but it surely really was about the spying). Maybe they'll quickly put cameras of their favorite places, if they are not already doing that. December 17 revision: heh, they are already doing that - https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/13/safety-robots-are-being-used-to-ward-off-san-franciscos-homeless-inhabitants/ (archive) (MozArchive). Didn't think it would get there so fast!

Paper cash will totally disappear. All our transactions will be connected to our actual title, as all the things else. There will probably be a large, worldwide database storing the bodily position of each particular person, in addition to everything he has ever carried out, stated, wrote, purchased...All his movements will, of course, be analyzed in real time by AI. I believe the expertise for all that already exists - so this is a social or logistical drawback, not a technological one. How long will it take the elites to install all that, and get people used to slavery? I don't know. But one thing is for positive: the comfortable life that you're used to, will be only a contented memory quickly.

Update 2022: by some means I felt like updating this, since I believe I didn't make my predominant point as effectively as I wished to. So, think about a video recreation character, like Mario. By interacting with the game, we can check how high he can jump, how long does it take him to reach full running speed, what kinds of enemies he can stomp on and which he can't, and so forth. Since Mario is only a program running on our computer systems / consoles, we are able to be taught all that he can do at any second. His leap peak is a relentless, so we can theoretically calculate whether he can hit some block, or in how a lot time (in-game frames) a sure enemy will reach us. More than that - by understanding the particulars of the sport, we are able to decide what's the very best course of action 5 ranges down the street.

This is, in actual fact, how extraordinarily exact speedruns are created. For easy games like Super Mario Bros, they're already very optimized, nearly right down to a single step. But the same rules apply to even advanced video games like JRPGs. Picking up a sure item early on can let you do something 2 hours later. Learning a certain ability that is weak at first can will let you kill the ultimate boss in one hit. Running from a battle can set a RNG-dependent variable to a sure optimum worth, and so on. To an everyday player, these strategies may appear silly in the quick time period, however they finalize in the best possible route in the long run. It is not nearly speedruns, but any form of problem runs, and many others. will require deep knowledge and long term analysis of the sport mechanics to perform.

Now what if I advised you that reality is the video game in query? Imagine - your location is already recognized by your smartphone, or automotive, or an internet of CCTV, or a mix of these. Your deepest darkest wishes are identified by your search engines like google, your network of pals by the social media services, and so forth. Just this alone enables big data, prediction and management abilities (this has been described within the earlier sections). But think about we go deeper with microchips, thought readers, smart cities and stuff like that. With growing technology, we turn into more like the video recreation character.

To reach that degree, we require three things. First is the technology that enables us precise sufficient data assortment. Second is highly effective computer systems that allow calculations quick enough to predict outputs based mostly on inputs long forward in time (what chess engines already do, however in a much more difficult system). The third is the technology that permits us to push switches - the best way a keyboard or joystick does in a video game machine. See, we're still bodily beings, dependent on issues like genes expressing themselves, neurons firing, hormones entering a cell to cause sure adjustments, and so forth. All of this could possibly be theoretically managed by know-how. Even now, with the comparatively simple switches that we have, we can already cause depression in social media users by displaying them sure tales. We will get folks to purchase issues because of AI-decided direct advertisements, and so on. Imagine if we get right down to the level of the cell!

And the elites are certainly working on such a know-how as we communicate. I mean, what do you think the mRNA vaccines are? Now I suppose a few of this could be used positively, but it someway by no means is in the present world, so it's a fool's dream. The primary level is, we will lose our humanity either means, when the evaluation and management skill reaches Mario's level. We will have to either resolve to inhibit such a technology, or hand over our humanity, since e.g mendacity won't be possible with neuron access. Hey, possibly you suppose that people will decide to hand over superior expertise. Forget about it, Ted Kaczynski has long disproved such a notion - technology develops pretty much by itself, without regard to human hopes and dreams.

And this is the reason we need the bodily infrastructure quickly. If the world is controlled by evil actors (as it is correct now) and they've all this functionality (which we don't), including direct cell entry, God assist us. The higher the know-how, the larger the power difference between us and the elites. Resistance will not be potential anymore when know-how reaches such a level (which I would guess takes no more than a number of a long time). Imagine them being in a position to show a graph of your almost certainly movements in keeping with the knowledge they have already got, in real time, and use it in opposition to you. How can you resist, when the computers can predict what you are going to do on Level 6 of the reality sport - and push a switch to deny or change it? You will never do something other than what the elites (or the AI, if it is given management and goes rogue) allow. And because the technological growth will not stop, we need to take over right now.